- Redmon discusses ‘Ice Road Truckers’ 100 comment(s)
- Rule bars handheld cell phone while driving Jan. 1 54 comment(s)
- FMCSA posts hours proposals 39 comment(s)
- Dave Redmon fired from one IRT show, quits other 32 comment(s)
- Rand McNally unveils Intelliroute TND 700 23 comment(s)
- Truckers News to host sleep apnea webinar 15 comment(s)
- Bank sues Arrow Trucking 13 comment(s)
- Trucks and women, then and now 10 comment(s)
- Does less equal more? 9 comment(s)
- Dave Redmon: ‘Ice Road’ firing was scripted 9 comment(s)
Court orders Long Beach port to do more work
July 20, 2011
| by: Truckers News Staff
Environmental and labor groups last week won a round in court against the Port of Long Beach in regard to its 2009 settlement with the American Trucking Associations over the port’s Clean Trucks Program.
The Natural Resources Defense Council and the Sierra Club went to court over the port’s plan to cut out some provisions and use less restrictive contracts over how to enforce a ban on the oldest, dirtiest trucks working the harbor.
ATA objected to the programs enacted in 2008 at both the ports of Long Beach and Los Angeles and took its case to federal court. The case against the Los Angeles port continues, but the Long Beach port settled.
Federal District Court Judge Christina A. Snyder ruled July 15 the port should have researched the environmental impacts before settling with ATA. The decision means port officials must conduct a study under the California Environmental Quality Act to evaluate whether more environmental analysis is necessary to understand the effects of its settlement with ATA.
Richard Steinke, port executive director, said, “We continue to stand behind this successful program, both in the air quality results and the process by which that success was achieved. Our Clean Trucks Program has been a major environmental success, reducing truck pollution by 80 percent so far. We’ve replaced thousands of older trucks with new cleaner models.”


