<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Port trucking bill draws congressional backers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.truckersnews.com/port-trucking-bill-draws-congressional-backers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.truckersnews.com/port-trucking-bill-draws-congressional-backers/</link>
	<description>Truckers News</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:51:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Truckonomics: Port Drivers Part 4 &#124; Blog4Truckers</title>
		<link>http://www.truckersnews.com/port-trucking-bill-draws-congressional-backers/comment-page-1/#comment-8819</link>
		<dc:creator>Truckonomics: Port Drivers Part 4 &#124; Blog4Truckers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2011 08:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truckersnews.com/?p=8314#comment-8819</guid>
		<description>[...] Transportation Committee Hearings, PortIndustryStudiesUnivofChicago/DavidBensman, LATimes.com, TruckersNews and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Transportation Committee Hearings, PortIndustryStudiesUnivofChicago/DavidBensman, LATimes.com, TruckersNews and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Environmental Law and Climate Change Law Newsletter, August 2, 2010, vol. 2, no. 22 &#171; Environmental Law &#38; Climate Change Law Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.truckersnews.com/port-trucking-bill-draws-congressional-backers/comment-page-1/#comment-6351</link>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Law and Climate Change Law Newsletter, August 2, 2010, vol. 2, no. 22 &#171; Environmental Law &#38; Climate Change Law Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Aug 2010 18:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.truckersnews.com/?p=8314#comment-6351</guid>
		<description>[...] Port trucking bill draws congressional backers. – Jill Dunn, Rotor News, July 29, 2010 Fifty-seven congressional representatives are co-sponsoring a bill that would amend federal law to allow ports new authority over trucking. On July 29, U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler introduced the Clean Ports Act of 2010. The current motor carrier statue enacted as part of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 allows state and local entities to regulate trucking companies for safety-related programs. Several labor and environmental groups support the New York Democrat’s bill. A temporary injunction is in place against the Port of Los Angeles from enforcing aspects of its concession agreement because of a lawsuit filed by the American Trucking Associations. The most controversial piece of the Los Angeles port’s program is drivers who regularly serve the port must be employees, not owner-operators, of carriers. Backers of this say the only way they will achieve the port’s environmental goals is through barring owner-operators from regular port service. Click Here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Port trucking bill draws congressional backers. – Jill Dunn, Rotor News, July 29, 2010 Fifty-seven congressional representatives are co-sponsoring a bill that would amend federal law to allow ports new authority over trucking. On July 29, U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler introduced the Clean Ports Act of 2010. The current motor carrier statue enacted as part of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994 allows state and local entities to regulate trucking companies for safety-related programs. Several labor and environmental groups support the New York Democrat’s bill. A temporary injunction is in place against the Port of Los Angeles from enforcing aspects of its concession agreement because of a lawsuit filed by the American Trucking Associations. The most controversial piece of the Los Angeles port’s program is drivers who regularly serve the port must be employees, not owner-operators, of carriers. Backers of this say the only way they will achieve the port’s environmental goals is through barring owner-operators from regular port service. Click Here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

