Researcher rejects hours studies

June 10, 2011

 | by: Truckers News Staff

The American Trucking Associations on June 9 said an internationally recognized safety researcher has questioned the cache of studies submitted recently by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration to support its hours-of-service proposal, saying the studies contain many problems and shouldn’t be relied on to support the agency’s proposed changes.

Ronald R. Knipling, former head of FMCSA’s research division and the first American to receive the Order of Merit from the International Road Transport Union for his work on truck safety, questioned the validity of the studies the agency inserted into the docket on May 6 after closing the comment period for its Notice of Proposed Rulemaking. FMCSA reopened the comment period for 30 days for discussion related only to the new documents; the deadline to submit comments was June 9.

Knipling raised “fundamental criticisms” of a study conducted by researchers at Pennsylvania State University, concluding that the sample of drivers, trucks and crashes, as well as minimal attention paid to other factors in crashes, rendered the study of little value. “It would be erroneous and unwarranted to accept Penn State’s principal findings and conclusions without extensive reanalysis, internal validation and external replication,” he wrote.

Similarly, Knipling said a study by the Virginia Tech Transportation Institute was lacking and concluded that “more probing and self-challenging analyses must be performed before [the] study[’s] findings can be accepted as sound science.”

Regarding a study of Florida transit bus drivers, Knipling concluded that the “significant differences between Florida’s transit bus operator work rules and those for interstate truck drivers render schedule-related research findings for one largely inapplicable to the other.”

Knipling also submitted a summary of his own work on the subject. He found that fatigue related to lack of prior sleep, being awake for more than 16 hours and early-morning driving was associated with many single vehicle truck crashes, while fatigue “related only to driving and work schedules (e.g., as prescribed by daily hours-of-service rules) were not. This non association was confirmed by several different types of analyses.” In addition, Knipling noted the risk of all types of truck crashes increased during daytime driving “consistent with increased exposure.”

Print This Post

3 Comments

  1. [...] In regards to the FMCSA’s study conducted by researchers at Penn State University, Knipling found that “the sample of drivers, trucks and crashes, as well as minimal attention paid to other factors in crashes, rendered the study of little value” and a replication study was necessary to replace implication with verification (http://www.truckersnews.com/researcher-rejects-hours-studies/?pg=1). [...]

  2. Todd Harris says:

    With the exception of fatigue related-early morning driving, much has not been mentioned or focused upon the confidence of the newly issued CDL driver. It takes time and experience to go beyond the pressures, and more time to be self aware of the driving abilities a driver should analyze. Studies may wish to extend through the minimum requirements in the schooling and training of drivers, and may wish to consider more team driving (one experienced vs. novice). A probationary period may be established, and reviewed bi-weekly; allowing for retraining in areas of backing, and turns, where accidents are not highway related.

  3. Todd Harris says:

    More studies need to address the newly issued CDL driver, which may also lead to suggested Team Driving [Senior / new driver]. For Solo Driving a bi-weekly review over a three month period may also address retraining exercises to resolve backing and turning accidents, not related to highway driving.

Leave a Reply

  • Randall-Reilly™