- FMCSA posts HOS questions for discussion 22 comment(s)
- Feature article: Runner with a cause 11 comment(s)
- NTSB pushes for sleep apnea program 6 comment(s)
- White House clears EOBR rule 6 comment(s)
- Pilot, Flying J wrap up merger 6 comment(s)
- Preregister for the Fit for the Road Too Hot to Trot - 5K Run/Walk 6 comment(s)
- Rand McNally unveils Intelliroute TND 700 5 comment(s)
- Hourly driver pay remains rare 5 comment(s)
- Marathon Trucker 4 comment(s)
- Carrier Transicold introduces hybrid refrigeration unit 4 comment(s)
Truckers urge hours flexibility
January 29, 2010
| by: Max Kvidera

Truckers challenge sleeper berth rules.
A refrain heard repeatedly at the latest hours of service listening session was the need for more flexibility in duty-hour and sleeper berth regulations.
At the fourth session organized by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration yesterday, Jan. 28, many speakers said existing rules are too restrictive and lead to increased fatigue, stress and log book cheating. The public sessions are part of another hours rulemaking FMCSA is conducting as part of a settlement with groups challenging the current regulations.
Instead of letting drivers sleep when they need it, log books are managing drivers’ sleep, said Brenda Neville, president of the Iowa Motor Truck Association.
Drivers often lose time in emergency situations such as bad weather or a traffic accident, and such delays count against their 14-hour duty clock, said Kathy Gillaspy, an over-the-road driver.
Tom Bower, a small fleet owner of four trucks and an operator from Kentucky, said the duty rule’s inflexibility causes him and his drivers to lose time. “Waiting can make you more tired than working,” he told an FMCSA panel at the session in Davenport, Iowa.
Ralph Pepper, who’s been driving for 36 years, said the current 14-hour duty period hurts his ability to make a living. “It’s coming down to a stranglehold on drivers out there,” said Pepper, one of dozens of who called in comments.
Chris Perry, who said he’s driven for more than 30 years with more than 3.5 million safe miles, called to say FMCSA treats all drivers the same with the existing regulations. “I’m treated like a rookie,” he said. “I know my limits. I know when I’m tired. I don’t need a babysitter. Before the DOT (Department of Transportation) took over, it seemed a lot easier because we were left alone to do our job, period.”
Attending the session in person, owner-operator Bob Kinsley of Toledo, Iowa, said that although he likes the 14-hour clock and the 11 hours of driving within that, he complained there’s no flexibility to take a nap or a break. “I don’t eat a meal in the truck stop,” he said. “I don’t have the time.”
Sounding the flexibility theme again, 10-year driver Andy Schreiber said, “If I want to pull over and take a nap and wait for rush-hour traffic to die down and do it safely, that should be up to the driver.”
Bob Stanton told the audience “The hours of service guide my life. I have to live by my log.” He also said he has obstructive sleep apnea, which requires him to spend more than four hours per night on pressure on his CPAP machine. He said any split in the sleeper berth time must provide him with at least five hours to maintain his medical certification. “The existing 14-hour and 10-hour rest combination has a major negative impact on my health.”
In his call, William Fields pointed to the excessive demands for speedy delivery as a major problem for drivers. “Ninety percent of our problems with the current rules are created by shippers and receivers,” he said. “They should be included in any new rulemaking.” He also called for more punishment for “companies forcing drivers to violate the rules in the name of money.”
Richard Pingel, an owner-operator who’s leased to an LTL carrier in Wisconsin, suggested simplifying the log book from four lines to two – on duty and off duty. Pingel, who has more than three million miles without an accident, recommended a “graduated log book” for drivers of different experience levels and mileage without accidents. He further suggested implementation of electronic on-board recorders to solve the hours problem.
Harold Babbitt of Babbitt Transportation of Fremont, Neb., said the closure of many rest areas makes it difficult for truckers to find “safe havens” to get rest during their 10-hour rest periods. If truckers park on Interstate exit ramps, they run the risk of getting ticketed.



I agree that we know when we are tired and need to rest. Do away with log books all together. I think that it should be mandatory for the shippers to show a log showing they gave the load, proper time to be transported to its destination. When drivers are not pushed to deliver loads , they get the propper rest they need. The shippers should start being check by DOT on a regular basis to make sure they gave enough time for the load to be delivered. That would pertect dribers. But as usual, How many times have we as drivers be told , Take it or we will find some one else. Drivers are only doing what they have to do to survive. And the real truth of it all is that the DOT are just chasing rabbits when it is all put on the driver. I wish someone would really listen. Thanks.
I DO AGREE ON SOME TIME LIMITATION ON THE HOURS WE DRIVE/WORK OTHERWISE WE WILL BE EXPLOITED BY COMPANIES/SHIPPERS. THE PRESENT 11 HOUR DRIVING MAX IS SUFFICIENT TO COVER AT LEAST 575 MILES (A.V. 52MPH)THEREFORE I FEEL WE DO NOT NEED ANY INCREASE, OR FOR THAT MATTER, DECREASE IN DRIVING TIME. I TAKE ISSUE WITH THE OVERALL CAP OF 14 HOUR WORK DAY WHICH INCLUDES THE DRIVING PORTION. THIS LIMITATION IS HIGHLY UNPRODUCTIVE AND DOWNRIGHT UNSAFE. IT PROHIBITS A DRIVER FROM TAKING A BREAK FROM HIS DRIVING HOURS FOR WHATEVER HIS REASONS, WITHOUT THIS CAP EVERPRESENT IN HIS MIND!! I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH EXTENDING OUR OVERALL UP TO 16, 17, OR 18 HOURS PROVIDED WE DO NOT EXCEED THE ACTUAL DRIVING TIME. FURTHER CLARIFICATION IS ALWAYS RECOMMENDED BUT I TRUST THE READER WILL UNDERSTAND MY POSITION.
We as drivers could make a good living with driving 10 hrs with 8 off or driving 11 hrs with 10 off. The problem with driver fatigue is NOT the hours you can drive, it’s only the symptom. THE problem is with shippers/receivers, and brokers!
When a receiver tells you to park your truck they will get to you later, where does the fault lie with drivers not making money now?
When they tell you to unload your truck set up the pallet for our warehouse, who at this point is causing the fatigue? When a broker sets a delivery appt. before the load is picked up and the driver can’t get there leagally and safely, who at that point demands the job be done?
Driver fatigue and cheating on hours of service is only the symptom. The real problem lies with the shipper, receiver, broker, and dispatcher.
But like any other gov’t agency, they just want to stop the sneezing instead of curing the cold!
I’M GLAD I DON’T HAUL LOGS !!!!!!!!!!LMMFAO!!!!!
The 11 hour rule is fine. The 14 hour rule needs to be changed back to the way it was originally. If you take a 2 hour nap, then it should extend your 14 hour clock 2 hours. NO driver wants to hurt anyone on the road. By getting the 2 hour break, we are able to go through large cities when the traffic is not at it’s peak without violation of the 14 hour rule. You get people going to or home from work, that is all they care about. Not the driver who is FORCED to drive through their town in order to satisfy the HOS rules. We all know how trucks get cut short all the time. If this wasn’t a problem, states like Ohio would not have signs warning motorists to leave trucks more room. Everybody is talking about safer roads. I agree. I don’t want a tired driver falling asleep next to my family on the road. Let us extend the 14 hour rule by time off duty.