- Redmon discusses ‘Ice Road Truckers’ 100 comment(s)
- Rule bars handheld cell phone while driving Jan. 1 54 comment(s)
- Dave Redmon fired from one IRT show, quits other 32 comment(s)
- How to Become an O/O: To lease or not to lease 30 comment(s)
- Pilot, Flying J wrap up merger 27 comment(s)
- New rule retains the 11-hour driving limit 21 comment(s)
- Ice Road Truckers head to Himalayas 17 comment(s)
- TA launches driver health and wellness program 15 comment(s)
- Feature article: Runner with a cause 14 comment(s)
- Clash of the generations 14 comment(s)
Trucking groups back ATA port appeal
January 7, 2011
| by: Jill Dunn
Four organizations have filed briefs supporting the American Trucking Associations’ appeal against the Port of Los Angeles over the port’s concession agreement.
The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, Intermodal Association of North America, National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation and the Center for Constitutional Jurisprudence, which filed jointly with the Harbor Trucking Association, have filed amicus briefs as of Jan. 6.
The foundation provides free legal aid to employees whose rights have been violated by compulsory unionism, while the center is a public interest law firm. The HTA is a coalition of Los Angles and Long Beach intermodal carriers.
On Aug. 26, the U.S. District Court for Central California found in favor of the port regarding the agreement it requires carriers to sign to do business with the entity. The most contentious issue was the port’s ban on owner-operators from regularly serving the port, requiring instead that they be carrier employees.
That ruling said the port’s requirements were protected from federal preemption because it was acting as a private market participant, which is immune from preemption.
If it had been acting as a governmental regulator, it would have to adhere to federal preemption.
Amicus briefs are filed by those who have a strong interest in the subject matter, but are not a party in the case. The friend of the court briefs reflect many points made by the ATA in its Dec. 28 brief, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the association said.
Owner-operators would be driven out of business by the port’s regulations and the application of the market participant exception would give the port free reign to interfere with virtually every aspect of the international commerce moving through it, the amicus briefs contended.


